Page 10 of 11

SU1.1-3 | Metabolic Response and Surgical Homeostasis — Assignment

CLINICAL SCENARIO

A 34-year-old previously healthy man is brought to the emergency department two hours after a high-speed motorcycle crash. He has a closed fracture of the right femoral shaft and a grade III splenic laceration managed non-operatively at first but now requiring emergency splenectomy. On arrival he is cool and clammy, drowsy but rousable, with a heart rate of 122/min, a blood pressure of 108/86 mmHg (narrowed pulse pressure) and a urine output that has fallen to 15 mL/h. Over the next five days he is resuscitated, taken to theatre, and recovers in the surgical high-dependency unit, where he becomes warm, vasodilated and persistently catabolic before slowly turning the corner.

Instructions

Using this patient as your anchor, write a structured account that traces his metabolic response to injury across time and then applies the principles of perioperative care to his journey. Ground every statement in the specific clinical picture described — do not write a generic essay. Where a number or threshold is relevant (for example fasting times, ASA grade, the phases of the WHO checklist), state it explicitly. Use the scaffolding sections below as the skeleton of your submission.

Length: 1200-1500 words

What to Submit

Describe the metabolic and physiological state you would expect in this patient in the first hours after injury. Explain, using Cuthbertson's model, why he is cool, drowsy, tachycardic and oliguric with a near-normal systolic pressure but a narrowed pulse pressure. Identify the neuroendocrine mediators (catecholamines, cortisol, glucagon, ADH, aldosterone) responsible and state what each is doing to defend his circulation.

Explain why, once resuscitated, he becomes warm, vasodilated and hypermetabolic with a high cardiac output. Distinguish the catabolic component (negative nitrogen balance, muscle protein breakdown, post-injury hyperglycaemia — 'the diabetes of injury') from the later anabolic component. Name the principal mediators of the catabolic flow phase and the inflammatory cytokines involved.

Identify at least four factors that could amplify or prolong this man's metabolic response (for example the magnitude of tissue injury, sepsis, hypothermia, uncontrolled pain, hypovolaemia, pre-existing nutritional state). For each, state the specific perioperative action you would take to attenuate it.

Map his care onto the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative phases. Address preoperative assessment and risk (assign and justify an ASA grade given the emergency context), the role and three steps of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist around his splenectomy, and the postoperative measures (analgesia, normothermia, euvolaemia, nutrition, early mobilisation) that blunt the stress response. Reference ERAS principles where they apply to emergency surgery.

In a short closing paragraph, explain in your own words why an understanding of the metabolic response to injury changes how you would interpret his observations day to day — in particular why a single 'normal' blood pressure was not reassurance, and how good perioperative care is, in effect, an attempt to control the stress response.

Grading Rubric — Metabolic Response and Perioperative Care — 30 points
Criterion Points Full-marks descriptor
Accurate description of the ebb phase and its neuroendocrine mediators, applied to this patient 7 pts Correctly identifies the ebb phase and explains catecholamines, cortisol, glucagon, ADH and aldosterone with accurate, patient-specific reasoning for the cool, oliguric, narrowed-pulse-pressure picture
Accurate account of the flow phase, distinguishing catabolic and anabolic components and the diabetes of injury 7 pts Clearly distinguishes catabolic from anabolic flow, explains hypermetabolism, negative nitrogen balance and post-injury hyperglycaemia with correct mediators and cytokines
Identification of modifying factors with specific attenuating actions 6 pts At least four modifying factors, each paired with a correct, specific perioperative action
Application of perioperative care across the three phases (ASA, WHO checklist, ERAS, postoperative measures) 7 pts Correctly assigns and justifies an ASA grade, names the three WHO checklist steps, and maps preoperative/intraoperative/postoperative measures including ERAS principles to this case
Synthesis, clinical reasoning and clarity of writing 3 pts Insightful synthesis linking the stress-response model to bedside interpretation; clear, well-structured prose